United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2024

(SS) Gallardo v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Gallardo v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided March 15, 2024
(SS) Gallardo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OFELIA GALLARDO, Case No. 1:23-cv-01484-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND 13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDING CASE2 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,1 (Doc. No. 14) 16 Defendant. ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 12) Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed March 14, 2024. (Doc. No. 14). Plaintiff Ofelia Gallardo and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.).

The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in The Court has substituted Martin O’Malley, who has been appointed the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, as the Defendant in this suit. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).

2 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 10).

1 | conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision.

2 | See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991) (addressing issue of attorney’s fees under | the Equal Access to Justice Act and calculating deadline using date of final judgment). The | Melkonyan court recognized 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) contemplates only two types of remand — || sentence four or sentence six. /d. at 98. A sentence four remand authorizes a court to enter “a | judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary, with or without | resetting the cause for a rehearing.” Jd. (other citations omitted).

8 The Court grants the parties’ motion to remand under sentence four and reverses the | Commissioner’s final decision. As agreed upon by the parties, upon remand, the Commissioner || will re-evaluate the evidence of record, and issue a new decision.

11 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 12 1. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.§ 405(g), the Court grants the joint motion to 13 remand (Doc. No. 14) and REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision. This case is 14 REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings 15 consistent with this Order.

16 2. A motion for attorney fees may be filed within thirty (30) days.

17 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12) is MOOT.

18 4. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff, terminate any deadlines, and close 19 this case. | Dated: _ March 15, 2024 Mihaw. Wh. foareh fackte 22 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 33 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.