1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 QUINTIN R. CROSS, No. 2:21-cv-0766 DJC CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 BRAZIL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42

. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 19 to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 20, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 21 recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice 22 to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 23 within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 26 States,

(9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 27 are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 28 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and 1 | recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s 2 | analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations issued February 20, 2024 are adopted 5 in full. 6 2. This action is dismissed. 7 3. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF 29) is DENIED as moot. 8 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 | Dated: _March 20, 2024 “Danel J CoD bnstto— Hon. Daniel alabretta 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 13 | cros0766.jo 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28