1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DE’ANDRE L. DEDMON, SR., No. 2:23-cv-0234 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER, FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MICHAEL FELDER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed January 8, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 18 to file an amended complaint was granted. On February 15, 2024, plaintiff was granted an 19 additional twenty days in which to file an amended complaint. Thirty days from that date have 20 now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the 21 court’s order. 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action to 23 a United States District Judge. 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 25 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 | with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 3 | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Y1st,

4 | (9th Cir. 1991). 5 | Dated: March 20, 2024

g ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 | pBie DB/Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/dedm0234.fta.ext

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28