1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANCISCO NUNO URENDA, No. 2:23-cv-1410 DJC AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 WARDEN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to

. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 8, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 21 recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice 22 to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 23 within twenty-one days. ECF No. 14. Neither party filed objections to the findings 24 and recommendations. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 26 States,

(9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 27 are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 28 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and 1 | recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s 2 | analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 14) are adopted in full; 5 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

is 6 | denied; and 7 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 | Dated: _March 29, 2024 “Dane A Ch brett Hon. Daniel alabretta " UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 Urent410.801.he 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28