(PC) Saintillus v. USA

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHALONER SAINTILLUS, No. 2:23-cv-2138 WBS CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a federal detainee proceeding pro se. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19 On February 29, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

23 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

25 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

28 ///// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 29, 2024 are adopted in full; and 3 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

4 | Dated: April 5, 2024 / , - 5 at en Vin (i 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE | sain2138,jo