1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAIFUSIN CHIU, Case No. 2:24-cv-00472-TLN-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ALL CHURCHES OUTSIDE CULTURE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 On March 11, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 20 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 3.) The time to 21 file objections has passed, and Plaintiff did not file any objections. 22 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 24 See Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 25 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court ….”). 26 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 27 the record and by the proper analysis. 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations, filed on March 11, 2024 (ECF No. 3 3), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter. 6 Date: April 10, 2024 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28