(PS) Aderholt v. Cooper

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(PS) Aderholt v. Cooper

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL ADERHOLT, No. 2:23-cv-1680 DAD DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF JIM COOPER, 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Daniel Aderholt is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to 19 the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). By order 20 issued September 28, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted leave to 21 file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was 22 granted twenty-eight days from the date of service of the order to file an amended complaint and 23 was specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner 24 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-eight-day period has 25 long since expired and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 27 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). 28 //// 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). Within fourteen days 3 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 | objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 5 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 6 | shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are 7 | advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 8 | District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst,

951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991). 9 | Dated: April 18, 2024 10 11 D ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 | DLB:6 26 DB/orders/orders.pro se/aderholt0289.fta.f&rs

27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown