(PC) Parker v. Lynch
(PC) Parker v. Lynch
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN A. PARKER, No. 2:23-cv-00536-DAD-DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JEFF LYNCH, 15 Defendant. 16 17 By order filed February 23, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and sixty days 18 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Sixty days from that date have now expired, and 19 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 21 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 25 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 26 and Recommendations.” 27 //// 28 //// 1 Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the 2 | right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,
951 F.2d 1153(9th Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: April 25, 2024 4 5 6 ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 8 9 DB16 10 DB/Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/park536.fta.ext 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown