United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2024

(SS) Kuhn v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Kuhn v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided April 29, 2024
(SS) Kuhn v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

1 Steven G. Rosales Attorney at Law: 222224 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC 12631 East Imperial Highway Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562) 868-5886 Fax: (562) 868-8868 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Susan Marie Kuhn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SUSAN MARIE KUHN, ) No. 2:22-cv-1835 DB 13 ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD 14 ) AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY vs. ) FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT 15 ) TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO MARTIN O'MALLEY, ) JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) Commissioner of Social Security, ) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 ) U.S.C. § 1920 17 Defendant. ) ) 18 ) TO THE HONORABLE DEBORAH BARNES, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Susan Marie Kuhn (“Kuhn”) be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of SEVEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED dollars ($7,100.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920.

1 This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 3 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).

4 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Kuhn, the government will consider the matter of Kuhn's assignment of EAJA fees to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

12 Fees shall be made payable to Kuhn, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Kuhn does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC, pursuant to the assignment executed by Kuhn.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC.

18 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Kuhn's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Kuhn and/or Steven G. Rosales including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

25 1 The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury 1 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Steven G. Rosales and/or the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

5 DATE: April 22, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 6 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING, INC., CPC 7 /s/ Steven G. Rosales2 BY: _________________________ 8 Steven G. Rosales Attorney for plaintiff Susan Marie Kuhn DATED: April 25, 2024 E. MARTIN ESTRADA 12 United States Attorney DAVID M. HARRIS 13 Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division 14 CEDINA M. KIM Assistant United States Attorney 15 Senior Trial Attorney, Civil Division /s/ Erin Jurrens 18 ERIN JURRENS Special Assistant United States Attorney 19 Attorneys for Defendant MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security 20 (Per e-mail authorization)

25 2 Counsel for the plaintiff attests that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3 DATED: April 26, 2024 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.