Tolden v. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Tolden v. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DELANO JAMES TOLDEN, Case No. 23-cv-03171-AMO (PR)

9 Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 10

11 U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF 12 CALIFORNIA, Respondent. 13 14 This suit was reassigned from a magistrate judge to the undersigned in light of a recent 15 Ninth Circuit decision.1 Petitioner Delano James Tolden, a state prisoner, filed this pro se petition 16 for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

. He has also filed motions for leave to 17 proceed in forma pauperis. Dkts. 7, 12. 18 Tolden has a pending habeas action with this Court in Case No. 23-cv-02449-AMO (PR), 19 challenging the same conviction and raising the same claims as in the instant petition. See Dkt. 7 20 in Case No. 23-cv-02449-AMO (PR). 21 Accordingly, the instant petition is DISMISSED as a duplicate petition to Case No. 23-cv- 22 02449-AMO (PR). The Court has reviewed Tolden’s claims and issued an order to show cause in 23 Case No. 23-cv-02449-AMO (PR). See Dkt. 11 in Case No. 23-cv-02449-AMO (PR). 24 // 25 // 26

27 1 Williams v. King,

875 F.3d 500, 503

(9th Cir. 2017) (holding that magistrate judge lacked 1 Tolden’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are GRANTED. Dkts. 7, 12. 2 || The Clerk of the Court shall terminate all pending motions and close the file. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: Janaury 9, 2024 5 HO - 6 . ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12

© 15 16 & = 17

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown