Kradin v. Volvo Car USA, LLC

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Kradin v. Volvo Car USA, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 AMANDA KRADIN, Case No. 23-cv-04898-TSH 7 Plaintiff, y. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 VOLVO CAR USA, LLC, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Neither party has made any appearance since Defendant Volvo Car USA, LLC removed 5 13 || this matter to this Court on September 25, 2024. The Court possesses the inherent power to 14 || dismiss an action sua sponte β€œto achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. 3 15 || Wabash R.R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626, 629-33

(1962). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff a 16 |} Amanda Kradin to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and 3 17 || failure to comply with court deadlines. Plaintiff shall file a declaration by February 1, 2024. Ifa 18 responsive declaration is filed, the Court shall either issue an order based on the declaration or 19 || conduct a hearing on February 15, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, 450 Golden 20 Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. 21 Notice is hereby provided that failure to file a written response will be deemed an 22 admission that you do not intend to prosecute, and this case will likely be dismissed. Thus, it is 23 || imperative the Court receive a written response by the deadline above. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: January 19, 2024 27 ALY \ Lj, THOMAS S. HIXSON 28 United States Magistrate Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown