Ayala v. People of California
Ayala v. People of California
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OIRAM ROMAN AYALA, Case No. 23-cv-04390-REL (PR) Plaintiff, v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant.
A review of this
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint shows that plaintiff Ayala is challenging his criminal sentence, not the conditions of confinement. Ayala invokes SB 394, codified as California Penal Code section 3051(b), which provides for parole hearings for youth offenders sentenced to life without parole (LWOP) for a crime committed before age 18 or sentenced to a determinate or indeterminate life term for a crime committed before age 26. (Compl., Dkt. No. 1 at 2-3.) He believes his LWOP sentence should “go down to a 20 year sentence” and his convictions for first degree murder should be reduced to second degree murder. (/d. at 3.) Because “habeas corpus is the exclusive remedy to attack the legality of the conviction or sentence,” the claims raised in the complaint must be raised through a habeas corpus petition. Nettles v. Grounds,
830 F.3d 922, 933(9th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, this civil rights lawsuit is DISMISSED without prejudice to Ayala raising his claims through a federal habeas petition. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 7, 2024 FO = RITAF.LIN United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown