Seth v. 22 Enterprises Inc.
Seth v. 22 Enterprises Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RAJ SETH, Case NO: 5:22-cv-0 NC 9 Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 10 y DISMISSAL 11 Re: ECF 45 9 22 ENTERPRISES, INC., and others, Defendants. 13
15 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that
GQ 16 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this
5 17 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the
18 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 19 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All scheduled dates are 20 || VACATED. 21 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 45 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 22 || Life Ins. Co. of Am.,
511 U.S. 375, 381(1994). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 || Dated: March 8, 2024 h-_———— _ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 26 United States Magistrate Judge 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown