United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2024

McGee v. The City of Hercules

McGee v. The City of Hercules
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided May 9, 2024
McGee v. The City of Hercules

Trial Court Opinion

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY MCGEE, Case No. 23-cv-05161-TSH 7 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 8 Vv. ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT 9 THE CITY OF HERCULES, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 26 10 Defendants. qg 12 Plaintiff Anthony McGee, who is representing himself, has filed a motion for entry of || default and default judgment against Defendants The City of Hercules and Hercules Police v 14 || Department. ECF No. 26. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), default may be || entered “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to || plead or otherwise defend.” As Defendants filed an Answer (ECF No. 11) and are actively = 17 || defending themselves in this matter, default is inappropriate. Further, entry of default is a || prerequisite for bringing a motion for default judgment under Rule 55(b). See Symantec Corp. v. || Glob. Impact, Inc., 559 F.3d 922, 923 (9th Cir. 2009) (noting the two-step process under Rule 55 || of entering default and then entering a default judgment); Smith v. Woodward, 2008 WL 2477382, || at *1 (ND. Cal. June 18, 2008) (denying default judgment motion as “premature because default || had not been entered against Defendants.”). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment || is DENIED.

24 IT IS SO ORDERED.

26 Dated: May 9, 2024 27 7 LU \ - Lj-~— THOMAS S. HIXSON 28 United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.