1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DEREK STEVEN MCCORMACK, Case No 24-cv-00232-AMO (PR)

8 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. 9

10 GENA JONES, Warden, Respondent. 11

12 Petitioner Derek Steven McCormack, a state prisoner, has filed this petition for a writ of 13 habeas corpus pursuant to

. He has paid the full filing fee. Dkt. 9. 14 It does not appear from the face of the petition that it is without merit. Good cause 15 appearing, the Court hereby issues the following orders: 16 1. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order upon Respondent and 17 Respondent’s attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California, at the following email 18 addresses: [email protected] and [email protected]. The petition and 19 the exhibits thereto are available via the Electronic Case Filing System for the Northern District of 20 California. The Clerk shall serve by mail a copy of this order on the petitioner. 21 2. Respondent shall file with this Court and serve upon the petitioner, within sixty 22 (60) days of the issuance of this Order, an Answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the 23 Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be 24 issued. Respondent shall file with the Answer a copy of all portions of the relevant state records 25 that have been transcribed previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues 26 presented by the petition. 27 3. If the petitioner wishes to respond to the Answer, he shall do so by filing a Traverse 1 Should the petitioner fail to do so, the petition will be deemed submitted and ready for decision 2 || sixty (60) days after the date the petitioner is served with Respondent’s Answer. 3 4. Respondent may file with this Court and serve upon the petitioner, within sixty 4 (60) days of the issuance of this Order, a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an 5 Answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 6 2254 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion, the petitioner shall file with the Court and serve 7 || on Respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion within sixty (60) days 8 of receipt of the motion, and Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on the petitioner a 9 || reply within fourteen (14) days of receipt of any opposition. 10 5. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to prosecute this case. The petitioner must keep 11 the Court and Respondent informed of any change of address and must comply with the Court’s 12 || orders in a timely fashion. Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11 a party proceeding pro 13 || se whose address changes while an action is pending must promptly file a notice of change of 14 address specifying the new address. See L.R. 3-11(a). The Court may dismiss a pro se action 15 without prejudice when: (1) mail directed to the pro se party by the Court has been returned to the 16 || Court as not deliverable, and (2) the Court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written 3 17 communication from the pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b); see also 18 Martinez v. Johnson,

(5th Cir. 1997) (Rule 41(b) applicable in habeas cases). 19 The petitioner must also serve on Respondent’s counsel all communications with the Court 20 || by mailing a true copy of the document to Respondent’s counsel. 21 6. Future requests for extensions of time must be submitted at least seven (7) days 22 || prior to the expiration of a deadline, as required by Section D.2 of the Court’s Standing Order for 23 Civil Cases. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: June 11, 2024 26 □ mn nace Meds ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN 28 United States District Judge