1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ABDULLAH AHAMED, Case No. 23-cv-1726-BAS-BLM

11 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 12 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

13 NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Abdullah Ahamed, proceeding pro se, filed this case concerning a disputed 17 payment of his credit card debt. (See generally Compl., ECF No. 1.) Subsequently, 18 Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint 19 principally on the grounds that Plaintiff’s Complaint did not state a plausible claim to relief. 20 (See generally ECF No. 7.) On March 29, 2024, the Court granted this motion to dismiss 21 because it concluded Plaintiff had not alleged facts sufficiently plausible to plead any of 22 his claims. (Dismissal Order, ECF No. 14.) However, the Court gave Plaintiff leave to 23 amend his Complaint and correct the deficient claims on or before April 19, 2024. (Id. at 24 8:12–13.) 25 Now, April 19, 2024, has come and gone without the filing of a corrected pleading. 26 Accordingly, the Court converts its dismissal of the Complaint into a dismissal of the 27 instant action. See Lira v. Herrera,

(9th Cir. 2005) (“If a plaintiff 28 does not take advantage of the opportunity to fix his complaint, a district court may convert 1 ||the dismissal of the complaint into dismissal of the entire action.”). Such dismissal shall 2 || be without prejudice. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to close the case. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 A 5 || DATED: April 24, 2024 Ypilag (Lyohaa é 6 United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4.