1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 GLORIA LOA, individually and on behalf No. 1:23-cv-00153-KES-SKO of all others similarly situated, 10 Plaintiff, 11 ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF v. COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 12 UNIVERSAL RECOVERY (Doc. 22) 13 CORPORATION,

14 Defendant.

15 16 On December 30, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing Plaintiff Gloria Loa’s 17 individual claims with prejudice. (Doc. 22.) The stipulation does not address the putative class 18 claims; therefore, those claims are dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). 19 In light of the parties’ stipulation, Plaintiff’s individual claims have been dismissed with 20 prejudice, the putative class claims have been dismissed without prejudice, and this action has been 21 terminated. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), (B); Wilson v. City of San Jose,

, 692 22 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23

24 IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Dated: January 2, 2025 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28