(PC) Russ v. Price

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(PC) Russ v. Price

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ROY RUSS, 1:24-cv-01466-CDB (PC)

10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 11 v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

12 BRANDON PRICE, et al. (Doc. 5)

13 Defendants.

14 15 Plaintiff Roy Russ is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 16

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on 17 December 3, 2024. (Id.). That same day, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma 18 pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 2). On December 4, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff within 45 days of 19 service of the order to submit a signed and completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or, 20 in the alternative, pay the $405.00 filing fee for this action. (Doc. 4). Therein, the Court noted that 21 while Plaintiff, a civil detainee, may not be subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) 22 requirement that a prisoner-plaintiff exhaust administrative remedies and provide copies of prisoner 23 trust fund account statements in support of any IFP application, he must comply with the 24 requirement under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

and Local Rule 121 to submit a financial affidavit in support 25 of his request to proceed in forma pauperis. (Id. at 2). Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis, filed 26 on January 6, 2025. (Doc. 5). Therein, Plaintiff attests he is being held at Coalinga State Hospital. 27 (Id. at 1). Plaintiff attests he has no gross pay or wages. (Id.). Plaintiff attests he receives other 28 1 source of income from family for canteen purchases, hygiene items, and phone calls. (Id.). Plaintiff 2 attests he has no money in cash or in a checking or savings account. (Id. at 2). Plaintiff attests he 3 owns no personal property or any item of value held in someone else’s name. (Id.). Plaintiff attests 4 he has no monthly expenses nor any dependents who rely on his support. (Id.). Plaintiff attests he 5 has no debts or financial obligations. (Id.). The application is signed and dated December 30, 6 2024. (Id.). 7 Plaintiff does not appear to have been a “prisoner” as defined by the at the time he filed this 8 action. Plaintiff asserts that he is a civil detainee involuntarily committed at Coalinga State Hospital 9 under the Welfare and Institutions Code Section 6600. (Doc. 1 at 7). Therefore, neither the filing fee provisions of

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b), nor § 1915(c)’s “three strikes” bar apply to this case. See 10 Andrews v. King,

398 F.3d 1113, 1122

(9th Cir. 2005). Further, examination of Plaintiff’s 11 application reveals that he is unable to afford the costs of this action. (Doc. 5). Thus, the Court 12 finds Plaintiff has made the showing required by § 1915, and the request to proceed in forma 13 pauperis shall be granted. 14 As to the status of the complaint, Plaintiff is advised that pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2), 15 the Court must conduct an initial review of a pro se complaint where the plaintiff proceeds in forma 16 pauperis to determine whether it is legally sufficient under the applicable pleading standards. The 17 Court must dismiss a complaint, or portion thereof, if the Court determines that the complaint is 18 legally frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks 19 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2). If the 20 Court determines that the complaint fails to state a claim, leave to amend may be granted to the 21 extent that the deficiencies in the complaint can be cured by amendment. 22 Plaintiff’s complaint will be screened in due course. If appropriate after the case has been 23 screened, the Clerk of the Court will provide Plaintiff with the requisite forms and instructions to 24 request the assistance of the United States Marshal in serving Defendants pursuant Rule 4 of the 25 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 Conclusion and Order 2 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma 3 || pauperis (Doc. 5), for good cause appearing, is GRANTED. 4 | IT IS SO ORDERED. ° Dated: _ January 8, 2025 | Ww R~ 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown