(SS) Rea v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(SS) Rea v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

1 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 2 MATHEW W. PILE Associate General Counsel 3 Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA (CABN 223600) 4 Special Assistant United States Attorney 5 Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 Office of the General Counsel 6 Social Security Administration 6401 Security Boulevard 7 Baltimore, MD 21235 Telephone: (510) 970-4809 8 Email: [email protected] 9 Attorneys for Defendant 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 CHRISTI LYNNE REA, Civil No. 1:24-cv-00584-KES-CDB 14 Plaintiff, 15 STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND vs. PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT 16 TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 17 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(d); ORDER

18 Defendant.

19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned 21 counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the 22 amount of SEVEN THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS 23 ($7,300.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA),

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(d). This amount 24 represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in 25 connection with this civil action, in accordance with

28 U.S.C. § 2412

(d). 26 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider 27 the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel Jonathan O. Pena (Counsel). 28 Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff,

560 U.S. 586, 598

(2010), the ability to honor the assignment will 1 depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department 2 of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will 3 determine whether they are subject to any offset. 4 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines 5 that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to 6 be made directly to Counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments 7 made shall be delivered to Counsel. 8 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA 9 attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the 10 EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and 12 bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel, including Counsel’s law firm and 13 associates, may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. 14 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel to seek Social Security Act 15 attorney fees under

42 U.S.C. § 406

(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 Dated: January 10, 2025 PENA & BROMBERG, PLC 18 By: /s/ Jonathan O. Pena* 19 JONATHAN O. PENA Attorneys for Plaintiff 20 [*As authorized by e-mail on Jan. 10, 2025] 21 Dated: January 10, 2025 PHILLIP A. TALBERT 22 United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE 23 Associate General Counsel 24 Office of Program Litigation, Office 7

25 By: /s/ Margaret Branick-Abilla MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA 26 Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 27

28 1 2 ORDER 3 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: January 10, 2025 4 A 4 L - lL | 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Stipulation; Order Page 3 Case No. 1:24-cv-00584-KES-CDB

Reference

Status
Unknown