Iliya v. United States Marshalls Service

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAUDA ILIYA, Case No. 24-cv-03720-TSH 7 Plaintiff, g y. SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, 10 Defendant.

12 On December 20, 2024, the Court granted Defendant United States Marshals Service’s 13. || motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil S 14 || Procedure 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Rule 15 12(b)(6). ECF No. 23. Although the Court granted leave to amend by January 21, 2025, Plaintiff || Dauda Ilya has failed to respond.

5 17 The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the 18 orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 19 (1962). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff Dauda Iliya to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court deadlines.

Plaintiff shall file a declaration by February 5, 2025. Notice is hereby provided that failure to file a written response will be deemed an admission that you do not intend to prosecute, and this case will likely be dismissed. Thus, it is imperative the Court receive a written response by the 54 deadline above.

35 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2025 □ 27 THOMAS S. HIXSON 2 28 United States Magistrate Judge