United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2025

(PC) Gallegos v. Fernandez

(PC) Gallegos v. Fernandez
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided January 21, 2025
(PC) Gallegos v. Fernandez

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BENJAMIN ROBERT GALLEGOS, No. 2:24-cv-2526 DJC CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER R. FERNANDEZ, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On November 22, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

25 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and | recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's | analysis.

3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 22, 2024, are adopted | in full; and 6 2. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF No. 2) is denied || without prejudice; and 8 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further | pretrial proceedings.

14 IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 | Dated: _January 17, 2025 “Dane A Ch brett Hon. Daniel alabretta 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.