1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COUNTY OF NEVADA, No. 2:24-cv-03245-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 WILD EARTH PROPERTY, LLC, et al., (ECF No. 3) 15 Defendants. 16 17 On December 4, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 18 recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on the parties and which contained 19 notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 20 within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes 21 that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,

(9th 22 Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt 23 v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 24 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause 25 appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and 26 recommendations in full. 27 //// 28 //// 1 | Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 3 2. This case is REMANDED back to Nevada County Superior Court; and 4 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 | Dated: _January 17, 2025 “Dane A Ch brett Hon. Daniel alabretta 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28