1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDEN WILLIE ISELI, No. 2:24-cv-3159 DJC AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 WILLIAM D JOHNSON, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to

. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 19, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and 21 recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice 22 that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 23 twenty-one days. ECF No. 3. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. 25 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 26 States,

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law 27 are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 28 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and 1 | recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s 2 | analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3) are adopted; 5 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice as second or successive; 6 3. The Court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 7 | U.S.C. § 2253 as Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a 8 | constitutional right, see

(c)(2); and 9 4. Petitioner's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 5) is denied as 10 | moot; and 11 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 | Dated: _January 17, 2025 “Dane A Hon. Daniel alabretta UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28