1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL E. JACQUES, No. 2:23-cv-00346-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 R. WEISS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Michael E. Jacques (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this 18 civil rights action seeking relief under

. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 25, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within 21 days. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff has not 23 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court[.]”). 28 1 Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to 2 | be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 18) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 5 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim, failure to 6 | prosecute, and failure to follow the Court’s order; and 7 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Date: January 24, 2025 10 11 7, TROY L. 13 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28