l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 || EMILY FORD, Case No.: 24-cv-2334-RSH-VET 2 Plants | ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR 13 || ORDER OF DISMISSAL 14 || ISAGENIX INTERNATIONAL LLC, [ECF Nos. 25, 27] 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Before the Court is the Parties’ “Stipulation of Dismissal.” ECF Nos. 25, 27. The 19 || stipulation satisfies the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)() and is effective on filing. 20 || Wilson v. City of San Jose,

(9th Cir. 1997). The action, in its entirety, is 21 ||hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each Party is to bear its own fees and costs. 22 ||The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary 23 || Restraining Order [ECF No. 2] is DENIED as moot. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: January 28, 2025 fekut C [bonne 26 7 Hon. Robert S. Huie United States District Judge