1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID WAYNE TALENT, No. 2:24-cv-01266-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT (ECF No. 21) SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On December 4, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 19 recommendations (ECF No. 21), which were served on the parties and which 20 contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 21 filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court 22 presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,

(9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de 24 novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause 26 appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and 27 recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 //// 1 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 21) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2 2. The Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend for lack of subject matter 3 jurisdiction and failure to state a claim; and 4 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 | Dated: January 31, 2025 “Daal A CoO □□□□ Hon. Daniel alabretta 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28