(PC) Hermann v. Madera County Sheriff Office Jail Division
(PC) Hermann v. Madera County Sheriff Office Jail Division
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZACHARY GREY HERMANN, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00446-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION 13 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE
14 MADERA COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE (Doc. 9) JAIL DIVISION, 15 Defendant.
16
17 Zachary Grey Hermann seeks to hold defendant liable for violations of his civil rights 18 pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 The magistrate judge recommended this action be dismissed without prejudice for 21 plaintiff’s failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address and failure to prosecute. (Doc. 22 9.) The Court advised Plaintiff that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may 23 result in waiver of his rights on appeal.” (Id. at 5, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler,
772 F.3d 834, 839 24 (9th Cir. 2014).)1 25 According to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court conducted a de novo review of this 26 case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and 27
1 1 | Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court 2 | ORDERS: 3 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on January 21, 2025 (Doc. 9) are 4 ADOPTED IN FULL. 5 2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for plaintiff's failure to obey the Local 6 Rules and failure to prosecute. 7 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending deadlines and to close this 8 case. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _ February 7, 2025 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown