1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY J. BISI, et al., No. 2:23-cv-02508-TLN-CSK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 CHASE AUTO J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Gregory J. Bisi (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. 19 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On December 27, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 29.) No objections were 23 filed. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has 27 reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is 28 1 || appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 29) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 | Date: February 7, 2025 8 Loxley 10 11 TROY L. NUNLEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28