1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMUEL PERRI, et al., No. 2:23-cv-02566-DAD-JDP 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 U.S. BANCORP, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On November 7, 2023, plaintiffs filed a complaint initiating this action alleging violations 18 of credit reporting laws. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiffs have settled their claims with the defendant 19 credit reporting agencies. (See Doc. Nos. 44–54.) Accordingly, this case proceeds only against 20 defendant U.S. Bank, N.A. (“U.S. Bank”). 21 On December 8, 2023, plaintiffs filed their first amended complaint (“FAC”). (Doc. No. 22 18.) On March 22, 2024, defendant U.S. Bank filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ FAC in its 23 entirety. (Doc. No. 33.) On August 16, 2024, the court granted defendant U.S. Bank’s motion to 24 dismiss plaintiffs’ FAC and also granted plaintiffs leave to amend their claims and file a second 25 amended complaint. (Doc. No. 55.) Plaintiffs were ordered to file their second amended 26 complaint or a notice of their intent to not file a second amended complaint by August 30, 2024. 27 (Id. at 9.) This deadline has long passed, and plaintiffs have not filed a second amended 28 complaint nor a notice of their intent to not file a second amended complaint. Indeed, plaintiffs’ 1 | counsel has not communicated with the court at all since before the court’s August 16, 2024 2 | order. 3 Under Rule 41(b), “the district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any 4 | order of the court.” Ferdik v. Bonzelet,

(9th Cir. 1992); see also Oliva v. 5 | Sullivan,

(9th Cir. 1992) (district court may dismiss sua sponte for failure 6 | to meet court deadline). 7 Accordingly, plaintiffs are ordered to show cause within seven (7) days from the date 8 | of entry of this order why this action should not be dismissed due to plaintiffs’ failure to comply 9 | with court orders. Alternatively, within seven (7) days from the date of entry of this order, 10 | plaintiffs may file a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41. 11 Plaintiffs are warned that their failure to comply with this order will result in this action 12 | being dismissed due to plaintiffs’ failure to comply with court orders. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: _ February 7, 2025 Dal A. 2d, aryek 15 DALE A. DROZD 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28