(PC) Diaz v. Botmi

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(PC) Diaz v. Botmi

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESUS DIAZ, No. 2:24-cv-1417 DAD AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 K. BOTMI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42

18 U.S.C. § 1983

. On November 25, 2024, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 24. On 19 January 3, 2025, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the 20 pending motion within twenty-one days. ECF No. 25. In the same order, plaintiff was informed 21 that failure to file an opposition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 22 without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Id.

23 The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a response to the motion 24 for summary judgment or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In recommending this action 25 be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the court has considered “(1) the public’s interest in 26 expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of 27 prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on their merits; and 28 (5) the availability of less drastic alternatives.” Ferdik v. Bonzelet,

963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61

(9th 1 |} Cir. 1992) (citation omitted). Because this case cannot move forward without plaintiff's 2 || participation, the court finds the factors weigh in favor of dismissal. 3 For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 4 | dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). Within fourteen days 7 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 8 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 9 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 10 || objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 11 | parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 12 || appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991). 13 || DATED: February 10, 2025 Lotto — Core 15 ALLISON CLAIRE 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown