Webb v. Nextera Energy Marketing, LLC

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Webb v. Nextera Energy Marketing, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADAM WEBB, No. 24-cv-02816-DC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 14 NEXTERA ENERGY MARKETING, LLC, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has reviewed the 18 parties’ joint status report (Doc. No. 16) and has determined that the court need not “consult[] 19 with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” before 20 issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). 21 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 22 The named defendants have been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. 23 No further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 25 II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS 26 Defendants state they may file a third-party complaint for contribution against Plaintiff’s 27 employer, Titan Renewables, for its failure to properly train Plaintiff and to supervise Plaintiff’s 28 work at the High Winds wind farm. (Doc. No. 16 at 2–3.) 1 Any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings must be filed no later 2 than June 2, 2025. No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without 3 leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth 4 Recreations, Inc.,

975 F.2d 27 604

(9th Cir. 1992). The parties are advised that the filing of 5 motions and/or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings does not imply good cause to 6 modify the existing schedule. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 (b)(4); see also Johnson,

975 F. 2d at 609

. 7 Moreover, any amendment requested under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) must not be: 8 (1) prejudicial to the opposing party; (2) the product of undue delay; (3) proposed in bad faith; or 9 (4) futile. See Foman v. Davis,

371 U.S. 178, 182

(1962). 10 III. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES 11 Discovery matters that do not implicate the schedule of the case are referred to the 12 assigned magistrate judge, who will hear all discovery disputes subject to his or her procedures. 13 (The assigned magistrate judge’s initials follow the district judge’s initials next to the case 14 number.) All discovery related filings must include the words “DISCOVERY MATTER” in the 15 caption to ensure proper routing. Do not direct delivery of courtesy copies of these documents to 16 the district judge. Counsel are directed to contact the magistrate judge’s courtroom deputy clerk 17 to schedule discovery matters for hearing. 18 All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the assigned magistrate judge’s 19 calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court and the magistrate judge’s own 20 procedures. The written ruling of the assigned magistrate judge shall be final, subject to 21 modification by the district court only where it has been shown that the magistrate judge’s order 22 is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(A). Pursuant to Local Rule 303, 23 any party may file and serve a “Request for Reconsideration by the District Court of Magistrate 24 Judge’s Ruling.” See L.R. 303(c). The requesting party must file and serve any such request 25 within fourteen (14) days of service of a written ruling. L.R. 303(b). The request must specify 26 which portions of the ruling are clearly erroneous or contrary to law and the basis for that 27 contention with supporting points and authorities. L.R. 303(c). 28 In addition, the assigned magistrate judge reviews proposed discovery phase protective 1 orders sought by the parties pursuant to Local Rule 141.1. However, any requests to seal or redact 2 in connection with trial or motions to be resolved by Judge Coggins must be directed to Judge 3 Coggins and comply with her Standing Order and Local Rules 140 and 141. 4 IV. DISCOVERY DEADLINES 5 A. Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures 6 The parties shall serve their initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7 Rule 26(a)(1) by no later than 14 days after the date of entry of this scheduling order. Fed. R. Civ.

8 P. 26

(a)(1)(C). 9 Any parties served or joined after the issuance of this scheduling order shall “make the 10 initial disclosures within 30 days after being served or joined,” as provided by Rule 26(a)(1)(D). 11 B. Fact Discovery 12 All fact discovery shall be completed1 no later than November 21, 2025, which is a date 13 proposed by the parties. The parties do not propose any limitations or changes to the governing 14 provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 15 C. Expert Discovery 16 Disclosures of expert witnesses, if any, must be made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 17 Procedure 26(a)(2)(A), (B) and (C), and shall include all information required thereunder. Each 18 expert witness must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions included in the 19 disclosures. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the imposition of appropriate 20 sanctions, including the preclusion of the expert’s testimony, or of other evidence offered through 21 the expert. 22 The parties shall disclose initial experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal 23 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than December 26, 2025, which is a date proposed 24 1 As used herein, the word “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so 25 that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has 26 been obeyed. The parties are advised that motions to compel must be filed in advance of the 27 discovery completion deadlines so that the court may grant effective relief within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure to have a discovery dispute heard sufficiently in advance of the 28 discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as untimely. 1 by the parties. With regard to expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be 2 disclosed and reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or 3 before January 23, 2026, which is a date proposed by the parties. 4 All expert discovery shall be completed no later than February 27, 2026, which is a date 5 proposed by the parties. 6 V. MOTIONS 7 All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other 8 emergency applications, shall be filed on or before March 27, 2026, which is a date proposed by 9 the parties, and shall be noticed for hearing before Judge Coggins on a date not more than 60 days 10 from the date the motion is filed and on a date that is listed on Judge Coggins’s website as an 11 available civil law and motion hearing date. Counsel are directed to refer to the local rules 12 regarding the requirements for noticing and opposing such motions on the court’s regularly 13 scheduled law and motion calendar. 14 Prior to filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for partial summary judgment 15 (summary adjudication), the parties are ordered to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, to 16 discuss the issues to be raised in the motion. In addition to complying with the requirements of 17 Local Rule 260, the parties must prepare a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts, which identifies 18 all relevant facts subject to agreement by all parties. The moving party is responsible for filing the 19 joint statement concurrently with the motion. In the notice of motion, the moving party shall 20 certify that the parties have met and conferred as ordered above or provide a statement of good 21 cause for the failure to do so. 22 The parties shall refer to Judge Coggins’s Standing Order for her procedures with regard 23 to the filing of cross-motions for summary judgment and related briefing. 24 VI. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 25 The undersigned requires parties to participate in a court-supervised settlement conference 26 with a settlement judge before the action may proceed to trial. A settlement conference has not 27 been set at this time. At any time before the final pretrial conference, the parties may file a joint 28 request that this action be referred to a settlement judge for the setting of a settlement conference. 1 If the parties have not participated in a court-supervised settlement conference by the time of the 2 final pretrial conference, the court will refer the action at that time to the assigned magistrate 3 judge for the setting of a settlement conference. The parties shall contact the designated 4 settlement conference judge’s chambers to ascertain that judge’s settlement conference 5 procedures, including the procedure for submitting confidential settlement statements, which shall 6 not be filed and will not otherwise be disclosed to the trial judge. 7 Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the court, the attorneys who will try the case 8 shall appear at the settlement conference. Pertinent evidence to be offered at trial, documents or 9 otherwise, should be brought to the settlement conference for presentation to the settlement judge. 10 Neither the settlement conference statements nor communications during the settlement 11 conference with the settlement judge can be used by either party in the trial of this case. 12 Absent permission from the court, in addition to counsel who will try the case being 13 present, the individual parties shall also be present, and in the case of corporate parties, 14 associations or other entities, and insurance carriers, a representative executive with unrestricted 15 authority to discuss, consider, propose and agree, or disagree, to any settlement proposal or offer 16 shall also be present. If for any reason the representative with unlimited authority cannot attend, 17 such a person must be available by phone or video throughout the conference. In other words, 18 having settlement authority “up to a certain amount” is not acceptable. 19 VII. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 20 The court will not set a final pretrial conference date in this scheduling order. Instead, 21 upon resolution of any motions filed by the deadline set forth in Section V of this order, or upon 22 the expiration of that deadline if no such motions were filed, the court will set a date for a final 23 pretrial conference, which will be conducted in person in Courtroom 8. The court will not 24 entertain requests to conduct the final pretrial conference by Zoom. 25 The parties are directed to file a joint pretrial statement, carefully prepared and executed 26 by all counsel, that complies with the requirements of this Local Rule 281 and Judge Coggins’s 27 Standing Order. Counsel shall also email a copy of the joint pretrial statement in Word format to 28 Judge Coggins’s chambers at [email protected]. The parties’ attention is directed to 1 Local Rules 281 and 282. This court will insist upon strict compliance with these rules. 2 At the final pretrial conference, the court will set a trial date and deadlines to file trial 3 documents, including motions in limine, trial briefs, and proposed jury voir dire, instructions, and 4 verdict forms (where applicable). In addition, at the final pretrial conference, the parties shall 5 have a joint list of proposed trial dates that are within 60 to 120 days from the date of the final 6 pretrial conference, and the parties shall be prepared to confirm a trial date. 7 VIII. REQUEST FOR BIFURCATION, APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER, OR 8 OTHER TECHNIQUES TO SHORTEN TRIAL 9 The parties have not made any such requests at this time. 10 IX. RELATED MATTERS PENDING 11 The parties have not alerted the court to any related litigation. 12 X. OBJECTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER 13 This case schedule will become final without further order of the court unless 14 objections are filed within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order. The schedule, once 15 final, shall not be modified except by leave of court upon showing of good cause. The assigned 16 magistrate judge is authorized to modify the discovery dates set forth in Section IV of this order, 17 but only to the extent that any such modification does not impact the motions filing deadline set 18 forth in Section V of this order. A stipulation or request by the parties to modify only the 19 discovery deadlines shall therefore be directed to the assigned magistrate judge. 20 The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 21 Procedure, no stipulations extending scheduling requirements or modifying applicable rules are 22 effective until and unless the court approves them. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone 23 does not constitute good cause. Any request or stipulation to modify this scheduling order must 24 set forth: 25 (1) the existing due date or hearing date as well as the discovery cutoff date, and the 26 last date for filing motions; 27 (2) whether there have been prior requests for extensions, and whether these were 28 granted or denied by the court; and 1 (3) specific, concrete reasons supporting good cause for granting of the extension. For 2 example, if the reason for the requested extension is that it “will promote 3 settlement,” the requesting party or parties must indicate the status of ongoing 4 negotiations, 1.e., have written proposals been exchanged; is counsel in the process 5 of reviewing a draft settlement agreement; has a mediator been selected. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. □ g | Dated: _ February 13, 2025 EIU os Dena Coggins 9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown