(PC) Carrion v. Doerer

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(PC) Carrion v. Doerer

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 AARON M. CARRION, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-1187 JLT EPG (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 13 v. ) ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE 14 J. DOERER, ) THE CASE ) 15 Defendant. ) (Doc. 5) ) 16

17 Aaron Carrion seeks to hold J. Doerer, Warden at United States Penitentiary Atwater, liable for 18 violations of his civil rights while incarcerated at the facility.1 The assigned magistrate judge found 19 Plaintiff failed to obey the Court’s order and failed to prosecute the action. (Doc. 5 at 1-2.) The 20 magistrate judge found terminating sanctions are appropriate, after considering the factors identified by 21 the Ninth Circuit in Pagtalunan v. Galaza,

291 F.3d 639, 642

(9th Cir. 2002). (Id. at 2-3.) Thus, the 22 magistrate judge recommended the Court dismiss the action without prejudice. (Id. at 4.) 23 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any 24 objections were due within 30 days. (Doc. 5 at 4.) The Court advised Plaintiff that the “failure to file 25 objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id., citing 26

27 1 On October 3, 2024, the Court severed Plaintiff’s claims from Benanti v. Doerer, Case No. 1:24-cv-01108-CDB (PC) and directed Plaintiff to: (1) file a signed complaint bearing his own case number; and (2) submit a completed 28 1 || Wilkerson v. Wheeler,

772 F.3d 834, 838-39

(9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the 2 || time to do so expired. 3 According to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. 4 || Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are 5 || supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 6 1. The Findings and Recommendations dated January 7, 2025 (Doc. 5) are ADOPTED i 7 full. 8 2. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and 9 failure to comply with the Court’s order. 10 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 11 12 ||IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _ February 18, 2025 Charis [Tourn 14 TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown