1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JENNIFER RUIZ, Case No. 2:23-cv-02945-KJM-JDP (SS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16

17 18 On April 16, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 19 served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 20 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 21 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 22

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 23 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 24 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 25 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 26 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 16, 2024, are ADOPTED; 3 2. The Commissioner’s motion to remand, ECF No. 8, is granted; 4 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a final judgment in favor of plaintiff and 5 against defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner; and 6 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter. 7 || DATED: February 20, 2025. oUt 9 = J W/ STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28