1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DAVID LAKIND, No. 1:24-cv-01010-JLT-SKO

10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 12 JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC., (Doc. 11) 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 On February 26, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing Plaintiff David 17 LaKind’s individual claims without prejudice. (Doc. 11.) The stipulation does not address the 18 putative class claims; therefore, those claims are also dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. 19 Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). 20 In light of the parties’ stipulation, Plaintiff’s individual claims have been dismissed 21 without prejudice, the putative class claims have been dismissed without prejudice, and this 22 action has been terminated. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), (B); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 23

(9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: February 26, 2025 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27

28