Packard v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Packard v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 BbsRchEoTeTl@ SlCjdHfaO.cEoLm, STATE BAR NO. 224212 2 ARASH AALEM, STATE BAR NO. 350739 [email protected] 3 LA FOLLETTE, JOHNSON, DeHAAS, FESLER & AMES 4 655 University Avenue, Suite 119 Sacramento, California 95825-6746 5 Telephone (916) 563-3100 • Facsimile (916) 565-3704
6 Attorneys for Defendant CVS PHARMACY, INC., and LONGS DRUG STORES 7 CALIFORNIA, LLC
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA- SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11 JOSHUA DAVID PACKARD, CASE NO.: 2:24-cv-02286-DJC-CKD [Removal from Superior Court of California, 12 Plaintiff, Nevada, Case No. CU0001431]
13 vs. [PROPOSED ORDER] 14 CVS PHARMACY, INC., LONGS STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, LLC, 15 and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, WITH MODIFICATIONS BY THE COURT
16 Defendants. TRIAL DATE: None Set 17 ACTION FILED: 06/04/24
18 19 20 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order. (ECF No. 13.) The 21 stipulation comports with the relevant authorities and the court’s applicable local rule. See L.R. 22 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. The 23 Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain jurisdiction over 24 enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see also, e.g., 25 MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc.,
2017 WL 495778(E.D. Cal., Feb. 03, 2017) (noting 26 that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective 27 orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective 28 order once the case is closed. 1 Further, this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle a party to file confidential 2 || information under seal. Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the 3 || standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material under 4 || seal. If a party’s request to file confidential material under seal is denied by the Court, then the 5 || party may file the information in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the Court. 6 || Dated: February 28, 2025 / aie } Kt | Ld a a CAROLYN K.DELANEY SS 8 2286.24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown