(PC) Schowachert v. Polley

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN PAUL FRANK SCHOWACHERT, Case No. 1:25-cv-0121 JLT BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DIRECTING BILL POLLEY, PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE WITHIN 30 DAYS 15 Defendant. (Docs. 2, 7) 17 John Paul Frank Schowachert seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, in which he alleges the defendant—the Tuolumne County Jail Commander—violated his civil rights at the jail. (Docs. 1, 2.) Reviewing Plaintiff’s litigation history, the magistrate judge identified six actions that qualified as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. 7 at 1-2, n.1.) In addition, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff “failed to allege that he was in any imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time the complaint was filed.” (Id. at 2.) Therefore, the magistrate judge found the imminent danger exception to Section 1915 does not apply and recommended that the Court deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Id. at 2-3.)

25 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 7 at 3.) The Court advised Plaintiff the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the ‘right to challenge the magistrate’s factual findings’ on appeal.” (Id., quoting Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838– | 39 (th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file any objections and the time to do so has passed.

2 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case.

3 | Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations | are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 5 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on February 5, 2025 (Doc. 7) are 6 ADOPTED in full.

7 2. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma paupers (Doc. 2) is DENIED.

8 3. Within 30 days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff SHALL pay in full 9 the $405.00 filing fee if he wishes to proceed with his action.

10 Plaintiff is advised that failure to pay the required filing fee as ordered will result in 11 the dismissal of this action without prejudice.

B IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 Dated: _ March 4, 2025 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE