United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2025

(PC) Gilley v. Fisher

(PC) Gilley v. Fisher
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided March 11, 2025
(PC) Gilley v. Fisher

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JACK F. GILLEY, No. 1:21-cv-00468 GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE NON-PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS 13 v. APPLICATION FISHER, PLAINTIFF’S NON-PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION DUE IN 15 Defendant. TWENTY-ONE DAYS 17 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On August 8, 2023, a notice of change of address filed by Plaintiff was docketed. ECF No. 12. The address Plaintiff has provided in the notice appears to be a residential one. See id. 22 An individual released from incarceration must be allowed to apply to proceed under general in forma pauperis provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). See DeBlasio v. Gilmore, 315 24 F.3d 396, 399 (4th Cir. 2003); see also Webb v. Lambert, No. CV 12-00041-H-DLC, 2012 WL 25 5931889, at *1 (D. Mont. Aug. 29, 2012) (citing DeBlasio). That person may proceed in forma pauperis upon satisfying the poverty provisions applicable to non-prisoners. McGann v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 96 F.3d 29, 30 (2d Cir. 1996).

1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of the Court’s application to proceed in forma pauperis for non-prisoners, and 4 2. Within twenty-one days from the date of this order, Plaintiff must COMPLETE AND FILE the non-prisoner in forma pauperis application in this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 Dated: March 11, 2025 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.