1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONATHAN BENNETT, No. 2:21-cv-1340 WBS CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 U. GARCIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under

. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 26, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having 27 reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 28 and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 92) are adopted in full; 3 2. This action is dismissed for failure to prosecute. 4 | Dated: March 14, 2025 Js Llec 4k_ □□□ □□ 5 WILLIAMB.SHUBB 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 | /benn21cv1340.801 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28