(PC) Thuemler v. Tehama County Jail

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JUSTIN M. THUEMLER, No. 2:24-cv-2059-DC-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. TEHAMA COUNTY JAIL, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants.

17 On September 19, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. In that order, plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint and the time for doing so has expired.

21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th | Cir. 1991).

3 || Dated: March 14, 2025 Card Kt | / ye □□□ 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE fi thue2059. fta(2) 1]