1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEVI DALE LASTER, JR., No. 2:24-cv-3312 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 USA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 On February 4, 2025, plaintiff’s second amended complaint was dismissed with leave to 18 file a third amended complaint. The third amended complaint was due on March 6, 2025, and 19 plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 21 court judge to this case, and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed 22 without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 27 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 28 ///// 1 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

(9th 2 | Cir. 1991). 3 || Dated: March 14, 2025 Card Kt | / ye □□□ 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 1 9 last3312.fta

10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28