1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KARLIS RUBEN AUGUSTUS No. 1:24-cv-01237 GSA (PC) HOWARD, 12 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW Plaintiff, CAUSE WHY THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT 13 BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE OBEY A v. COURT ORDER 14 SERGEANT GUERRERO, et al., (ECF No. 8) 15 Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE OR, IN 16 THE ALTERNATIVE, EITHER HIS FILING OF A NON-PRISONER IN FORMA 17 PAUPERIS APPLICATION OR THE PAYMENT OF THE FILING FEES IN FULL 18 DUE IN SEVEN DAYS 19 20 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this 21 civil rights action seeking relief under

. The matter was referred to a United 22 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 23 For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff will be ordered to show cause why this matter 24 should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. As an alternative to filing the showing 25 of cause, Plaintiff may file a completed non-prisoner in forma pauperis application, or he may pay 26 the filing fees in full. Plaintiff shall have seven days to take one of these courses of action. 27 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 28 On February 4, 2025, a notice of change of address filed by Plaintiff was docketed. See 1 ECF No. 7. In it, the new address provided by Plaintiff appeared to be a residential address 2 indicating that Plaintiff was no longer incarcerated. See

Based on this, on February 5, 2025 3 Plaintiff was ordered to file a non-prisoner in forma pauperis application. See ECF No. 8. He 4 was given thirty days to complete the form and return it to the Court.

5 More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s order, no 6 has he requested an extension of time to do so, either. 7 II. DISCUSSION 8 Upon release from prison, a former inmate must be allowed to apply to proceed under 9 general in forma pauperis provisions of

(a)(1). See DeBlasio v. Gilmore, 315

(4th Cir. 2003); In re Prison Litigation Reform Act,

(6th Cir. 11 1997) (upon release, obligation to pay remainder of fees to be determined solely on question of 12 whether individual qualifies for pauper status). A released prisoner may proceed in forma 13 pauperis upon satisfying the poverty provisions applicable to non-prisoners. McGann v. Comm’r, 14 Soc. Sec. Admin.,

(2d Cir. 1996). 15 Because Plaintiff has neither provided a non-prisoner in forma application to the Court, 16 nor has he paid the filing fee in full, this matter may not proceed any further. As a result, Plaintiff 17 will be ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court 18 order. As an alternative to filing the showing of cause, Plaintiff may either pay the filing fees in 19 full, or he may complete and file a non-prisoner in forma application. Plaintiff will be given 20 seven days to take either course of action. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff another copy of the Court’s application to 23 proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner; 24 2. Plaintiff is ordered to SHOW CAUSE why this matter should not be dismissed for 25 failure to obey a court order. See ECF No. 8; 26 3. As an ALTERNATIVE to filing the showing of cause, Plaintiff may either pay the 27 filing fees in full, or he may complete and file a non-prisoner in forma pauperis application, and 28 4. Plaintiff shall have seven days to take one of these courses of action. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2

3 Dated: March 20, 2025 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4

5

6

7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28