(PS) Adams v. Bonta
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRANDON G. ADAMS, Case No. 2:24-cv-3300-DAD-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ROB BONTA, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 On January 29, 2025, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and dismissed it for failure to state a claim. ECF 4. I ordered plaintiff to file, within thirty days, either an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal of this action. Id. To date, plaintiff has not complied with that order.1 21 The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); see Local Rule 110 (“Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.”). A court may dismiss 27 1 Plaintiff has filed various exhibits. ECF Nos. 5 & 6. These filings, however, cannot reasonably be construed as an amended complaint or otherwise responsive to the January 29 order.
1 | an action based on a party’s failure to prosecute an action, failure to obey a court order, or failure | tocomply with local rules. See Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) | (dismissal for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with local rules).
4 I will give plaintiff a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for his | failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs failure to respond to this order will constitute | another failure to comply with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this action | be dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within fourteen days why this case | should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to | state aclaim. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, he shall file, within fourteen | days, an amended complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13 ( 1 Ow — Dated: _ March 26, 2025 q-—— 14 JEREMY D. PETERSON 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.