1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAIFUSIN CHIU, No. 2:25-cv-0407-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 THE PRESIDENT OF THE US, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Taifusin Chiu (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action 18 which was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On February 7, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 21 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 3.) This deadline has 22 passed, and Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 26 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] 27 court[.]”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be 28 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 7, 2025 (ECF No. 3), are ADOPTED in 3 full; 4 2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and 5 3. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment and close this case. 6 | Date: March 28, 2025 4 8 10 TROY L. NUNLEY 4 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28