(PC) Bains v. Adams

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SURINDER BAINS, No. 2:23-0986 DJC CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ADAMS, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On February 11, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and | recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s | analysis.

3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 27) are adopted in full; 5 2. Plaintiff's consent to a U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 3) is withdrawn; 6 3. Plaintiff's request to have the case referred to a district judge for all further || proceedings (ECF No. 26 at 6) is denied; and 8 4. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings | consistent with Local Rule 302.

14 IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 | Dated: _April 2, 2025 “Daniel CoD tto— Hon. Daniel □□ |. Cod 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 jpain23cv0986.801