1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTY PHILLIPS, No. 2:24-cv-3378 DJC CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking 18 relief under

. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 24, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 21 recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice 22 to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 23 within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 26 States,

(9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 27 are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 28 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and 1 | recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s 2 | analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 9) are adopted in full; 5 2. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining 6 || state law claims in this action; 7 3. Plaintiff's unopposed motion to remand (ECF No. 6) is granted, and the case 8 || is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, Christy Philips 9 | v. State of California, No. 24-cv-018638; and 10 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a certified copy of the order of 11 | remand to the Clerk of the Sacramento County Superior Court. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 | Dated: _April 2, 2025 “Daniel CoD tto— Hon. Daniel It |. Cod 1s UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 | jphilzacva378.801 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28