(PC) O'Brien v. Moran
(PC) O'Brien v. Moran
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KORY T. OBRIEN, No. 2:24-cv-2963 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 M. MORAN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant. 16 17 On February 27, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended 18 complaint. The amended complaint was due on March 31, 2025, but plaintiff has not filed an 19 amended complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 21 court judge to this case; and 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 28 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 1 | time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,
951 F.2d 1153(9th 2 | Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: April 8, 2025 Card Kt lez (g— 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 4 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7H g obri2963.fta 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown