1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Khamkoth Keopadubsy, No. 2:20-ev-01412-KJM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv. 14 Siemens Mobility, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The request to extend the reply deadline and hearing date (ECF No. 53) is denied for lack 18 | of good cause, see Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.,

(9th Cir. 1992), 19 | and in light of the multiple extensions of time the court has already granted, ECF Nos. 52, 47, 43. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 | DATED: April 21, 2025. oUt 22 — 4 W/ □□□ STATES DISTRICT JUDGE