(PC) Harper v. Williams

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(PC) Harper v. Williams

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL HARPER, No. 2:24-cv-1278-DJC-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CLAYBURNE WILLIAMS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. By order filed April 3, 2025, the 19 court denied plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis status and ordered plaintiff to 20 pay the $405.00 filing fee within 14 days to proceed in this action. Because plaintiff has failed to 21 pay the filing fee as ordered by the court, this action should be dismissed without prejudice. 22 For the reasons set forth above, it is RECOMMENDED as follows: 23 1. This action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee. 24 2. The Clerk of the Court be directed to close this case. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(l). Within 14 days after 27 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 28 the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 1 | Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 || objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 || Martinez v. Yist,

951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: April 23, 2025 ( aie fh / ap a 5 CAROLYNK. DELANEY 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 || 8, narp1278.f: 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown