United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2025

Martin v. City of McFarland

Martin v. City of McFarland
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided April 29, 2025
Martin v. City of McFarland

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CORDERO ANTHONY MARIN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00483-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA 13 v. PAUPERIS CITY OF MCFARLAND, et al., (Doc. 2) 15 Defendants.

18 Plaintiff Cordero Anthony Marin (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on April 28, 2025. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff has not paid the $405.00 filing fee and submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2).

21 The Court may authorize the commencement of an action without prepayment of fees “by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such [person] possesses [and] that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

24 Here, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s application (Doc. 2) and finds the requirements of 28 25 U.S.C. § 1915(a) are satisfied.

26 As to the status of Plaintiff’s complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court is authorized to conduct an initial review of all pro se complaints where the plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis to determine whether the complaint is legally sufficient under the applicable || pleading standards. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (“section 1915(e) || applies to all in forma pauperis complaints, not just those filed by prisoners”). The Court must | dismiss a complaint, or portion thereof, if the Court determines that the complaint is legally | frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary || relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). If the Court | determines that the complaint fails to state a claim, leave to amend may be granted to the extent || that the deficiencies in the complaint can be cured by amendment.

8 Plaintiffs complaint will be screened in due course. Given the tremendous case backlog | experienced by all judges in the Eastern District of California, delays are inevitable. If || appropriate after the case has been screened, the Clerk of the Court will provide Plaintiff with the || requisite forms and instructions to request the assistance of the United States Marshal in serving || Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.

13 | Conclusion and Order 14 Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that || Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint || will be screened in due course.

17 | ITIS SO ORDERED. 'S | Dated: _ April 29, 2025 | hr 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.