Ashford v. Google, Inc

United States District Court for the Southern District of California

Ashford v. Google, Inc

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BURK N. ASHFORD, Case No.: 25-cv-0327-BJC-AHG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 13 v. TO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [ECF NO. 7] 14 GOOGLE, et al, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On February 12, 2025, Plaintiff Burk N. Ashford filed a Petition for Preliminary 19 Injunction alleging Defendants Google and Yahoo have locked him out of his personal 20 email accounts, and he seeks “unfettered access to his email accounts from wherever he 21 may be.” [ECF No. 1.] Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 22 (“IFP”) which the Court denied on February 19, 2025. [ECF Nos. 3, 4.] 23 Plaintiff has filed a Renewed Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 24 pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a). [ECF No. 7.] For the reasons stated below, his motion is 25 GRANTED. 26 Generally, all parties instituting a civil action in this court must pay a filing fee. See 27

28 U.S.C. § 1914

(a); Civ.L.R. 4.5(a). However, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a), the court 28 may authorize the commencement, prosecution, or defense of any suit without payment | ||of fees if the plaintiff submits an affidavit, including a statement of all his or her assets, 2 || showing that he or she is unable to pay filing fees or costs. “An affidavit in support of an 3 || IFP application is sufficient where it alleges that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and 4 ||still afford the necessities of life.” Escobedo v. Applebees,

787 F.3d 1226, 1234

(9th Cir. 5 ||2015). “[A] plaintiff seeking IFP status must allege poverty with some particularity, 6 || definiteness and certainty.” /d. (internal quotation marks omitted). The granting or denial 7 ||of leave to proceed IFP in civil cases is within the sound discretion of the district court. 8 || Venerable v. Meyers,

500 F.2d 1215, 1216

(9th Cir. 1974) (citations omitted). 9 In his application, Plaintiff states that he receives $1,310 in monthly income from 10 }/‘“Pension, annuity, or life insurance payments.” [ECF No. 7 at 4.] Plaintiff states his 11 ||/monthly expenses include $600 rent, $35 telephone, and that his utilities and medical co- 12 || pays vary. [/d. at 5.] Plaintiff states he has $97.39 in his Chase account. [/d. at 7.] Although 13 ||he does not provide an accurate accounting of his monthly expenses, Plaintiff's income 14 || and bank account indicate that he does not have funds to pay the filing fee and still “afford 15 necessities of life.” Escobedo,

787 F.3d at 1234

. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS 16 || Plaintiff’?s IFP Motion [ECF No. 7.] 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 ||Dated: April 29, 2025 19 20 6 oq Gan CG Lh fu 21 29 Honorable Benjamin J. Cheeks United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown